Banks and other financial institutions were exempted 
						from the goods and services tax when it was introduced 
						because of the difficulty of defining the service to be 
						taxed.
 
							
							
						
						Mr Weatherill is proposing a separate tax that would 
						apply only to margins. He said work published by the 
						National Centre for Social and Economic Modelling showed 
						it would target higher rather than lower earning 
						households.
 
							
							
						
					The South Australian treasury believed the tax would raise 
					$3 billion to 4.5 billion per year. It would operate 
					nationally, to prevent tax competition between the states. 
					All of the money raised would flow to the states.
 
							
							
						
					"I know the first instinct of banks might be to rule out 
					such a thing," he said. "And it's true that some of it will 
					fall on bank profits. But before you shed a tear for the 
					banks, let me remind you that the Commonwealth Bank 
					announced a full-year net [profit of] $9 billion for 2014-15 
					and in May the other members of the big four each announced 
					half-yearly profits in the vicinity of $3.5 billion."
 
							
							
						
					Mr Weatherill said the $3 billion to 4.5 billion raised 
					would only go some way to meeting a gap in funding for 
					health services of $35 billion per year by 2030 identified 
					by his NSW colleague Mike Baird.
 
							
							
						
					"You might be concerned about the equity effects of 
					extending the GST, but what about the equity of not properly 
					funding state health systems and making them user-pays," he 
					said. 
 
							
							
						
					The chief executive of the Australian Council of Social 
					Service Cassandra Goldie said while she didn't rule out 
					extending the GST with compensation for low income earners, 
					it was "the last grand bargain we should accept". 
 
							
							
						
					"We had compensation when the GST was first put in," she 
					said. "But since then both Labor and the current government 
					have made major changes to the social security rules that 
					have cut income supports. We are very worried about the idea 
					that you can push up the GST and compensate people and solve 
					the problem. 
 
							
							
						
					"Before we go looking at the GST as a source of revenue, we 
					we should look at other changes such as broadening the base 
					of the income tax, and cutting superannuation tax breaks. 
					Those changes could not only raise revenue. they would help 
					the economy." 
 
							
							
						
					Former NSW treasurer Michael Egan told the summit the idea 
					that the GST could be raised to cut the rate of company tax 
					was "complete ninkinpoopary". 
 
							
							
						
					"There's not a politician anywhere in the world that would 
					dare put that proposition to the electorate because they 
					would just get killed. So the business community should just 
					forget it," he said. 
 
							
							
						
					"The other thing people have got to realise, and the 
					business community in particular, is that tax reform can't 
					just be about reducing the burden of taxation. We huge 
					budget deficit and we need to fund the services that people 
					demand. Any changes to the tax system have to take into 
					account that the overall tax burden has to increase." 
 
						
							
						
						
						
						Source:: 
						The Sydney Morning Herald, dated 23/09/2015.